Cephalosporin resistance, tolerance, and approaches to improve their activities.

Cephalosporins comprise a ß-lactam antibiotic class whose first members were discovered in 1945 from the fungus Cephalosporium acremonium. Their clinical use for Gram-negative bacterial infections is widespread due to their ability to traverse outer membranes through porins to gain access to the periplasm and disrupt peptidoglycan synthesis. More recent members of the cephalosporin class are administered as last resort treatments for complicated urinary tract infections, MRSA, and other multi-drug resistant pathogens, such as Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Unfortunately, there has been a global increase in cephalosporin-resistant strains, heteroresistance to this drug class has been a topic of increasing concern, and tolerance and persistence are recognized as potential causes of cephalosporin treatment failure. In this review, we summarize the cephalosporin antibiotic class from discovery to their mechanisms of action, and discuss the causes of cephalosporin treatment failure, which include resistance, tolerance, and phenomena when those qualities are exhibited by only small subpopulations of bacterial cultures (heteroresistance and persistence). Further, we discuss how recent efforts with cephalosporin conjugates and combination treatments aim to reinvigorate this antibiotic class.

[Practicability of the German guidelines on skin and soft tissue infections]. / Praktikabilität der Leitlinie zu Haut- und Weichgewebeinfektionen.

The guidelines on calculated parenteral initial treatment of bacterial infections in adults from 2018 were the first German language S2k guidelines for these infections. This article summarizes the experiences with respect to their practicality in the clinical routine and the resulting supplementations and comments. In view of the many different terms for soft tissue infections, the guidelines had to first establish some definitions and diagnostic criteria. Among others, the guidelines introduced the provisional term limited phlegmons (phlegmons are usually termed cellulitis in Angloamerican literature) for the frequent initially superficial soft tissue infections with Staphylococcus aureus, which do not always extend to the fascia, in order to differentiate them from erysipelas caused by Streptoccocus, which in contrast to phlegmons always respond to penicillin. The general symptoms present in erysipela are a practical differential criterion. Somewhat more complex are the definitions and recommendations for the severe forms of phlegmon, which involve the fascia and are accompanied by necrosis, so that here the practicality of the guidelines needs to prove its worth over time. The guidelines also give recommendations how to proceed in case of alleged or confirmed hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics. Currently, relevant guidelines recommend, and it is correspondingly here elaborated, that in acute cases a beta-lactam antibiotic with side chains other than those in the suspected drug may present an alternative without prior testing. Therefore, cefazolin, that does not share any side chains with other beta-lactam antibiotics, could be administered under appropriate precautionary measures. The term cellulitis is avoided in the guidelines. Since it is used frequently, and also for non-infectious dermatoses, the various meanings are discussed and distinguished from each other.

Management of nonfermenting gram-negative infections: a critique of the guidelines.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In the present narrative review, we discuss the characteristics and differences between the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) guidelines in terms on their recommendations/suggestions for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii infections. RECENT FINDINGS: Treatment of severe infections caused by nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria (NF-GNB) is posing both novel hopes and novel challenges to physicians worldwide, and both the IDSA and the ESCMID have recently updated/released their guidelines or guidance documents, based on different philosophies and providing recommendations for the treatment of NF-GNB infections. In order to correctly exploit recent advances in the treatment of such infections, IDSA and ESCMID approaches should be viewed as complementary and evolving, and should not preclude further revision based on accumulating evidence on the use of novel ß-lactams and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations. SUMMARY: A joint consideration of both philosophies should leave the door opened for the wise use of novel agents, ultimately building precious experience on their use that could favorably influence future guidelines revisions.

Efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for Lyme neuroborreliosis: An updated systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based recommendations for treatment of Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) should rely on the available literature. As new data emerges, close review and evaluation of the recent literature is needed to build evidence-based recommendations to inform clinical practice and management of LNB. We performed an update of a previous systematic review on treatment of LNB. METHODS: A systematic literature search of Medline and CENTRAL was performed for published studies from 2015 to 2023 to update a previous systematic review. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRS) were evaluated. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tools for RCTs; NRS were assessed using the ROBINS-I-tool. Quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Data were integrated into an existing meta-analysis of the available literature. RESULTS: After screening 1530 records, two RCTs and five NRS with new and relevant data were additionally identified. Meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between doxycycline and beta-lactam antibiotics regarding residual neurological symptoms after 12 months. Meta-analysis showed no benefit of extended antibiotic treatment of LNB. Three NRS show no benefit for additional steroid use in LNB with facial palsy. DISCUSSION: Additional incorporated recent research corroborates existing guideline recommendations for treatment of LNB. New RCTs add to the certainty of previous analysis showing similar efficacy for doxycycline and beta-lactam antibiotics in LNB. Available evidence shows no benefit for extended antibiotic treatment in LNB. NRS do not suggest a role for steroids in facial palsy due to LNB.

Intra-abdominal infection after tumor surgery: tigecycline combined with ß-lactam antibiotics versus tigecycline alone.

BACKGROUNDS: Tigecycline has a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity and has been approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections. However, it is debatable whether tigecycline should be used alone or in combination. This study aimed to investigate whether tigecycline plus ß-lactam antibiotics (combination therapy [CT] group) are superior to tigecycline alone (monotherapy [MT] group) in non-critically ill intra-abdominal infection patients after tumor surgery. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was mortality during the hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were clinical success rate, microbial eradication rate, relapse rate within one week, course of treatment, and adverse effects. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust the degree of infection before medication between the MT and CT groups. Univariate comparisons were performed using the chi-squared test for qualitative variables and Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables, as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between antimicrobial treatments and mortality during hospitalization. The paired samples Wilcoxon test was used to compare the parameters before and after medication. RESULTS: In total, 291 patients were included in the final analysis: 128 in MT group and 163 in CT group. Mortality rate was 6.25% in the MT group and 6.13% in the CT group (P = 0.97). Multivariate logistic regression model showed that carbapenem-resistant organisms (OR: 4.35, 95% CI: 2.36 ~ 61.70) and age > 65 (OR: 1.32, 95% CI:1.19 ~ 3.01) were independent risk factors for death. CT group had a shorter defervescence time (P < 0.05), with less likelihood of relapse (P < 0.05) but had a more significant effect on activated partial thromboplastin and prothrombin time. CONCLUSIONS: Tigecycline plus ß-lactam wasn't superior to tigecycline monotherapy for the treatment of non-critically ill patients with intra-abdominal infection. But for advanced age patients with cancer, tigecycline combination therapy maybe a better choice in terms of mortality.

Antibiotic strategies for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory tract infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa occur in most people with cystic fibrosis (CF). Established chronic P aeruginosa infection is virtually impossible to eradicate and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Early infection may be easier to eradicate. This is an updated review. OBJECTIVES: Does giving antibiotics for P aeruginosa infection in people with CF at the time of new isolation improve clinical outcomes (e.g. mortality, quality of life and morbidity), eradicate P aeruginosa infection, and delay the onset of chronic infection, but without adverse effects, compared to usual treatment or an alternative antibiotic regimen? We also assessed cost-effectiveness. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and conference proceedings. Latest search: 24 March 2022. We searched ongoing trials registries. Latest search: 6 April 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of people with CF, in whom P aeruginosa had recently been isolated from respiratory secretions. We compared combinations of inhaled, oral or intravenous (IV) antibiotics with placebo, usual treatment or other antibiotic combinations. We excluded non-randomised trials and cross-over trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected trials, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 11 trials (1449 participants) lasting between 28 days and 27 months; some had few participants and most had relatively short follow-up periods. Antibiotics in this review are: oral - ciprofloxacin and azithromycin; inhaled - tobramycin nebuliser solution for inhalation (TNS), aztreonam lysine (AZLI) and colistin; IV - ceftazidime and tobramycin. There was generally a low risk of bias from missing data. In most trials it was difficult to blind participants and clinicians to treatment. Two trials were supported by the manufacturers of the antibiotic used. TNS versus placebo TNS may improve eradication; fewer participants were still positive for P aeruginosa at one month (odds ratio (OR) 0.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 0.18; 3 trials, 89 participants; low-certainty evidence) and two months (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.65; 2 trials, 38 participants). We are uncertain whether the odds of a positive culture decrease at 12 months (OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.67; 1 trial, 12 participants). TNS (28 days) versus TNS (56 days) One trial (88 participants) comparing 28 days to 56 days TNS treatment found duration of treatment may make little or no difference in time to next isolation (hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.76; low-certainty evidence). Cycled TNS versus culture-based TNS One trial (304 children, one to 12 years old) compared cycled TNS to culture-based therapy and also ciprofloxacin to placebo. We found moderate-certainty evidence of an effect favouring cycled TNS therapy (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.82), although the trial publication reported age-adjusted OR and no difference between groups. Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture-based TNS therapy One trial (296 participants) examined the effect of adding ciprofloxacin versus placebo to cycled and culture-based TNS therapy. There is probably no difference between ciprofloxacin and placebo in eradicating P aeruginosa (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.44; moderate-certainty evidence). Ciprofloxacin and colistin versus TNS We are uncertain whether there is any difference between groups in eradication of P aeruginosa at up to six months (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.23; 1 trial, 58 participants) or up to 24 months (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.42; 1 trial, 47 participants); there was a low rate of short-term eradication in both groups. Ciprofloxacin plus colistin versus ciprofloxacin plus TNS One trial (223 participants) found there may be no difference in positive respiratory cultures at 16 months between ciprofloxacin with colistin versus TNS with ciprofloxacin (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.29; low-certainty evidence). TNS plus azithromycin compared to TNS plus oral placebo Adding azithromycin may make no difference to the number of participants eradicating P aeruginosa after a three-month treatment phase (risk ratio (RR) 1.01, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.35; 1 trial, 91 participants; low-certainty evidence); there was also no evidence of any difference in the time to recurrence. Ciprofloxacin and colistin versus no treatment A single trial only reported one of our planned outcomes; there were no adverse effects in either group. AZLI for 14 days plus placebo for 14 days compared to AZLI for 28 days We are uncertain whether giving 14 or 28 days of AZLI makes any difference to the proportion of participants having a negative respiratory culture at 28 days (mean difference (MD) -7.50, 95% CI -24.80 to 9.80; 1 trial, 139 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Ceftazidime with IV tobramycin compared with ciprofloxacin (both regimens in conjunction with three months colistin) IV ceftazidime with tobramycin compared with ciprofloxacin may make little or no difference to eradication of P aeruginosa at three months, sustained to 15 months, provided that inhaled antibiotics are also used (RR 0.84, 95 % CI 0.65 to 1.09; P = 0.18; 1 trial, 255 participants; high-certainty evidence). The results do not support using IV antibiotics over oral therapy to eradicate P aeruginosa, based on both eradication rate and financial cost. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found that nebulised antibiotics, alone or with oral antibiotics, were better than no treatment for early infection with P aeruginosa. Eradication may be sustained in the short term. There is insufficient evidence to determine whether these antibiotic strategies decrease mortality or morbidity, improve quality of life, or are associated with adverse effects compared to placebo or standard treatment. Four trials comparing two active treatments have failed to show differences in rates of eradication of P aeruginosa. One large trial showed that intravenous ceftazidime with tobramycin is not superior to oral ciprofloxacin when inhaled antibiotics are also used. There is still insufficient evidence to state which antibiotic strategy should be used for the eradication of early P aeruginosa infection in CF, but there is now evidence that intravenous therapy is not superior to oral antibiotics.

Extended and Continuous Infusion of Novel Protected ß-Lactam Antibiotics: A Narrative Review.

Consolidated data from pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies support the administration of ß-lactam antibiotics in prolonged infusion (i.e., extended or continuous) to optimize therapeutic efficacy by increasing the probability of attaining maximal bactericidal activity. This is the longest possible time during which the free drug concentrations are approximately four-fold the minimum inhibitory concentration between dosing intervals. In the context of antimicrobial stewardship strategies, achieving aggressive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets is an important tool in the management of multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacterial infections and in the attainment of mutant preventing concentrations. However, prolonged infusion remains an unexploited resource. Novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor (ßL/ßLI) combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam) have been released in recent years to face the emerging challenge of MDR Gram-negative bacteria. Pre-clinical and real-life evidence has confirmed the promising role of prolonged infusion of these molecules in specific settings and clinical populations. In this narrative review we have summarized available pharmacological and clinical data, future perspectives, and current limitations of prolonged infusion of the novel protected ß-lactams, their application in hospital settings and in the context of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.

Continuous vs Intermittent Meropenem Administration in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: The MERCY Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Meropenem is a widely prescribed ß-lactam antibiotic. Meropenem exhibits maximum pharmacodynamic efficacy when given by continuous infusion to deliver constant drug levels above the minimal inhibitory concentration. Compared with intermittent administration, continuous administration of meropenem may improve clinical outcomes. Objective: To determine whether continuous administration of meropenem reduces a composite of mortality and emergence of pandrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant bacteria compared with intermittent administration in critically ill patients with sepsis. Design, Setting, and Participants: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial enrolling critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock who had been prescribed meropenem by their treating clinicians at 31 intensive care units of 26 hospitals in 4 countries (Croatia, Italy, Kazakhstan, and Russia). Patients were enrolled between June 5, 2018, and August 9, 2022, and the final 90-day follow-up was completed in November 2022. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive an equal dose of the antibiotic meropenem by either continuous administration (n = 303) or intermittent administration (n = 304). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and emergence of pandrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant bacteria at day 28. There were 4 secondary outcomes, including days alive and free from antibiotics at day 28, days alive and free from the intensive care unit at day 28, and all-cause mortality at day 90. Seizures, allergic reactions, and mortality were recorded as adverse events. Results: All 607 patients (mean age, 64 [SD, 15] years; 203 were women [33%]) were included in the measurement of the 28-day primary outcome and completed the 90-day mortality follow-up. The majority (369 patients, 61%) had septic shock. The median time from hospital admission to randomization was 9 days (IQR, 3-17 days) and the median duration of meropenem therapy was 11 days (IQR, 6-17 days). Only 1 crossover event was recorded. The primary outcome occurred in 142 patients (47%) in the continuous administration group and in 149 patients (49%) in the intermittent administration group (relative risk, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.81-1.13], P = .60). Of the 4 secondary outcomes, none was statistically significant. No adverse events of seizures or allergic reactions related to the study drug were reported. At 90 days, mortality was 42% both in the continuous administration group (127 of 303 patients) and in the intermittent administration group (127 of 304 patients). Conclusions and Relevance: In critically ill patients with sepsis, compared with intermittent administration, the continuous administration of meropenem did not improve the composite outcome of mortality and emergence of pandrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant bacteria at day 28. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03452839.

Antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a cystic fibrosis population after introduction of a novel cephalosporin/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a new ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2019 for the treatment of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia. The combination is a particularly potent inhibitor of penicillin-binding proteins with higher affinity than other ß-lactam agents. Persons with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) often harbour resistant Gram-negative bacteria in the airways and need antibiotics to prevent declining lung function. To test whether the introduction of ceftolozane-tazobactam in the period 2015-2020 led to a bacterial population level increase in cephalosporin resistance in a Danish CF population. In vitro, activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam was evaluated by susceptibility testing of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from pwCF from January 1, 2015, to June 1, 2020. Six thousand three hundred thirty two isolates collected from 210 adult pwCF were included. Thirty pwCF were treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam at least once. Ceftolozane-tazobactam exposure did not increase cephalosporin resistance on an individual or population level. However, resistance to ceftolozane-tazobactam was recorded despite no prior exposure in four pwCF. Compared to ceftazidime, ceftolozane-tazobactam had a better in vitro activity on P. aeruginosa. The percentage of non-mucoid P. aeruginosa isolates susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam were higher or equal to 5 other ß-lactams. Ceftolozane-tazobactam expands the armamentaria against P. aeruginosa with acceptable levels for a selection of drug resistance.

The Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Durlobactam in Combination With Sulbactam in In Vitro and In Vivo Infection Model Systems Versus Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex.

Sulbactam-durlobactam is a ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination currently in development for the treatment of infections caused by Acinetobacter, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates. Although sulbactam is a ß-lactamase inhibitor of a subset of Ambler class A enzymes, it also demonstrates intrinsic antibacterial activity against a limited number of bacterial species, including Acinetobacter, and has been used effectively in the treatment of susceptible Acinetobacter-associated infections. Increasing prevalence of ß-lactamase-mediated resistance, however, has eroded the effectiveness of sulbactam in the treatment of this pathogen. Durlobactam is a rationally designed ß-lactamase inhibitor within the diazabicyclooctane (DBO) class. The compound demonstrates a broad spectrum of inhibition of serine ß-lactamase activity with particularly potent activity against class D enzymes, an attribute which differentiates it from other DBO inhibitors. When combined with sulbactam, durlobactam effectively restores the susceptibility of resistant isolates through ß-lactamase inhibition. The present review describes the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship associated with the activity of sulbactam and durlobactam established in nonclinical infection models with MDR Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. This information aids in the determination of PK/PD targets for efficacy, which can be used to forecast efficacious dose regimens of the combination in humans.

A meta-analysis on the prevalence of resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to different antibiotics in Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: Rapid emergence of multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus has resulted to difficulty in treatment of infections caused by such strains. The aim of this meta-analysis study was to determine the pooled prevalence of resistance of S. aureus to different antibiotics in Nigeria. METHODS: Literature search for studies was done using Google scholar, PubMed, Science direct, and African Journal Online. The prevalence of S. aureus resistance to different antibiotics was evaluated using the meta-analysis proportion command in MedCalc software version 20.0 adopting a rand effect model. I2 statistic and Egger test in MedCalc was used to evaluate the heterogeneity and the presence of publication bias among studies respectively. RESULTS: A total of 40, 682 studies were retrieved through the database search of which 98 studies met the study inclusion criteria. Prevalence of resistance of S. aureus to different antibiotics ranges from 13 to 82%. Results showed a very high degree of resistance to penicillin G (82% [95% confidence interval (CI) 61%, 0.96%]), cloxacillin (77% [95% CI 64%, 88%]), amoxacillin (74% [95% CI 66%, 81%]), cefuroxime (69% [95% CI 51%, 85%]), ampicillin (68% [95% CI 53%, 81%]). Moderately resistance to erythromycin (47% [95% CI 40%, 53%]), chloramphenicol (47% [95% CI 37%, 56%]), methicillin (46% [95% CI 37%, 56%]), ofloxacin (24% [95% CI 18%, 31%]) and rifampicin 24% [95% CI 6%, 48%]). Low resistance was observed in vancomycin 13% (95% CI 7%, 21%). For each individual meta-analysis, high heterogeneity was observed with I2 range (79.36-98.60%) at p-values ≤ 0.01). Egger's tests for regression intercept in funnel plots indicated no evidence of publication bias. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis study established that S. aureus in Nigeria has developed resistance to commonly used antibiotics such as the beta-lactam class antibiotics, sulphonamides, tetracyclines, chloramphenicol, and vancomycin. Hence it is imperative to develop programs to promote rational use of antimicrobial agents, infection prevention and control to reduce the incidence of antimicrobial resistance.

Intrawound application of vancomycin reduces the proportion of fracture-related infections in high-risk tibial plateau fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the improvements in surgical techniques and the use of prophylactic intravenous antibiotics, the fracture-related infection (FRI) incidence after high-risk tibial plateau fractures remains high. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effect of the intrawound application of vancomycin on the FRI after high-risk tibial plateau fracture surgery. METHODS: A total of 243 patients who underwent high-risk tibial plateau fracture surgery from May 2013 to June 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 233 cases were enrolled. Considering the preoperative patient condition, surgeons applied vancomycin powder directly into the surgical site before wound closure in 105 cases (intrawound application of vancomycin powder with preoperative intravenous cephalosporin). The remaining 128 cases served as the control group (preoperative intravenous cephalosporin alone). Clinical data and surgical details were recorded. The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess risk factors for FRI. The Kaplan-Meier method and the log rank test illustrated the infection status of patients based on the application of intrawound vancomycin. The primary outcome was an FRI within one year. Secondary outcomes included bacterial culture and vancomycin-related complications. RESULTS: Our study demonstrated a significant difference in the incidence of FRI between the vancomycin group and the control group (3.8% versus 10.9%; p=0.041). Multivariable Cox regression showed the intrawound application of vancomycin powder decreased the rate of FRI. There were no complications related to intrawound vancomycin observed during follow-up. The presence of Gram-positive FRI was higher in the control group compared with the vancomycin group. CONCLUSIONS: Intrawound application of vancomycin was associated with a significant lower rate of FRI after high-risk tibial plateau fracture surgery compared to the control group.

MIC Discrepancies between Parenteral and Oral Anti-Staphylococcal Beta-Lactams among MSSA.

INTRODUCTION: Recent evidence has shown that oral antibiotic therapy is not inferior to IV antibiotic therapy in the treatment of complicated Staphylococcus aureus infections. Therefore, oral antibiotic therapy is now frequently prescribed in clinical practice due to cost benefit, ease of administration, decreased complication rate, and lack of need for IV access. In vitro susceptibility testing for ß-lactam oral antibiotics is not routinely performed as the guidelines provided by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommend using oxacillin and cefoxitin as surrogate markers. Hence, oral antibiotic susceptibilities for cephalexin and dicloxacillin are not reported and implied based on oxacillin and cefoxitin. The objective of the current study was to determine whether susceptibilities among S. aureus isolates are predictable when comparing commonly used IV and oral beta-lactams. METHODS: Cefazolin, cephalexin, dicloxacillin, and oxacillin broth microdilution minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for 100 clinical isolates of methicillin-sensitive S. aureus by broth microdilution following CLSI guidelines. RESULTS: Among these isolates, median MICs for cephalexin were eight-fold higher than cefazolin MICs and median MICs for dicloxacillin were four-fold less than oxacillin MICs. Ten percent of more strains studied had a major or very major error in its susceptibility reporting when cephalexin was compared to its surrogate marker oxacillin. DISCUSSIONS/CONCLUSIONS: The variations in MICs observed compounded with the dosing and pharmacokinetic differences of oral versus IV ß-lactam suggests that establishing breakpoints for oral ß-lactam antibiotics is necessary to ensure adequate therapy is selected for the treatment of complex S. aureus infections.

Beta-lactam induced morphological changes in serum of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae blood isolates.

Klebsiella pneumoniae is an opportunistic pathogen, which frequently causes bacteremia. Ceftazidime and meropenem, two important beta-lactam antibiotics for treatment of K. pneumoniae infections, induce morphological changes in bacteria when examined in vitro. Thirty clinical Klebsiella spp. Bacteremia isolates were analyzed for antimicrobial resistance and serum resistance. To determine whether complement influenced the resistance to ceftazidime of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing-isolates and sensitivity to meropenem, one serum resistant and one partly serum sensitive isolate were analyzed in normal human serum, heat-inactivated human serum, and growth medium with addition of beta-lactam antibiotics. HA391 was resistant to ceftazidime and had identical minimum inhibitory concentrations for meropenem in normal human serum, heat-inactivated serum and RPMI. In normal human serum, HA233 was inhibited by ceftazidime and had lower inhibitory concentrations of meropenem. Morphological changes induced by serum and beta-lactam antibiotics were analyzed by light- and electron microscopy. Light microscopy showed elongation of bacteria treated with ceftazidime. By electron microscopy membrane attack complexes were observed for HA233 in normal human serum, thereby facilitating beta-lactam antibiotics access to the periplasmic space and the peptidoglycan layer, explaining the increased killing of HA233 by beta-lactam antibiotics. Complement did not enhance beta-lactam killing of HA391, underlining the importance of serum susceptibility.

ESCMID/EUCIC clinical practice guidelines on perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in patients colonized by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria before surgery.

SCOPE: The aim of the guidelines is to provide recommendations on perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) in adult inpatients who are carriers of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) before surgery. METHODS: These evidence-based guidelines were developed after a systematic review of published studies on PAP targeting the following MDR-GNB: extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), aminoglycoside-resistant Enterobacterales, fluoroquinolone-resistant Enterobacterales, cotrimoxazole-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), extremely drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, colistin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, and pan-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. The critical outcomes were the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSIs) caused by any bacteria and/or by the colonizing MDR-GNB, and SSI-attributable mortality. Important outcomes included the occurrence of any type of postsurgical infectious complication, all-cause mortality, and adverse events of PAP, including development of resistance to targeted (culture-based) PAP after surgery and incidence of Clostridioides difficile infections. The last search of all databases was performed until April 30, 2022. The level of evidence and strength of each recommendation were defined according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Consensus of a multidisciplinary expert panel was reached for the final list of recommendations. Antimicrobial stewardship considerations were included in the recommendation development. RECOMMENDATIONS: The guideline panel reviewed the evidence, per bacteria, of the risk of SSIs in patients colonized with MDR-GNB before surgery and critically appraised the existing studies. Significant knowledge gaps were identified, and most questions were addressed by observational studies. Moderate to high risk of bias was identified in the retrieved studies, and the majority of the recommendations were supported by low level of evidence. The panel conditionally recommends rectal screening and targeted PAP for fluoroquinolone-resistant Enterobacterales before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy and for extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales in patients undergoing colorectal surgery and solid organ transplantation. Screening for CRE and CRAB is suggested before transplant surgery after assessment of the local epidemiology. Careful consideration of the laboratory workload and involvement of antimicrobial stewardship teams before implementing the screening procedures or performing changes in PAP are warranted. High-quality prospective studies to assess the impact of PAP among CRE and CRAB carriers performing high-risk surgeries are advocated. Future well-designed clinical trials should assess the effectiveness of targeted PAP, including the monitoring of MDR-GNB colonization through postoperative cultures using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing clinical breakpoints.

Treatment of enteric fever (typhoid and paratyphoid fever) with cephalosporins.

BACKGROUND: Typhoid and paratyphoid (enteric fever) are febrile bacterial illnesses common in many low- and middle-income countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends treatment with azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, or ceftriaxone due to widespread resistance to older, first-line antimicrobials. Resistance patterns vary in different locations and are changing over time. Fluoroquinolone resistance in South Asia often precludes the use of ciprofloxacin. Extensively drug-resistant strains of enteric fever have emerged in Pakistan. In some areas of the world, susceptibility to old first-line antimicrobials, such as chloramphenicol, has re-appeared. A Cochrane Review of the use of fluoroquinolones and azithromycin in the treatment of enteric fever has previously been undertaken, but the use of cephalosporins has not been systematically investigated and the optimal choice of drug and duration of treatment are uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of cephalosporins for treating enteric fever in children and adults compared to other antimicrobials. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, the WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov up to 24 November 2021. We also searched reference lists of included trials, contacted researchers working in the field, and contacted relevant organizations. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults and children with enteric fever that compared a cephalosporin to another antimicrobial, a different cephalosporin, or a different treatment duration of the intervention cephalosporin. Enteric fever was diagnosed on the basis of blood culture, bone marrow culture, or molecular tests. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were clinical failure, microbiological failure and relapse. Our secondary outcomes were time to defervescence, duration of hospital admission, convalescent faecal carriage, and adverse effects. We used the GRADE approach to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS: We included 27 RCTs with 2231 total participants published between 1986 and 2016 across Africa, Asia, Europe, the Middle East and the Caribbean, with comparisons between cephalosporins and other antimicrobials used for the treatment of enteric fever in children and adults. The main comparisons are between antimicrobials in most common clinical use, namely cephalosporins compared to a fluoroquinolone and cephalosporins compared to azithromycin. Cephalosporin (cefixime) versus fluoroquinolones Clinical failure, microbiological failure and relapse may be increased in patients treated with cefixime compared to fluoroquinolones in three small trials published over 14 years ago: clinical failure (risk ratio (RR) 13.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.24 to 55.39; 2 trials, 240 participants; low-certainty evidence); microbiological failure (RR 4.07, 95% CI 0.46 to 36.41; 2 trials, 240 participants; low-certainty evidence); relapse (RR 4.45, 95% CI 1.11 to 17.84; 2 trials, 220 participants; low-certainty evidence). Time to defervescence in participants treated with cefixime may be longer compared to participants treated with fluoroquinolones (mean difference (MD) 1.74 days, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.98, 3 trials, 425 participants; low-certainty evidence). Cephalosporin (ceftriaxone) versus azithromycin Ceftriaxone may result in a decrease in clinical failure compared to azithromycin, and it is unclear whether ceftriaxone has an effect on microbiological failure compared to azithromycin in two small trials published over 18 years ago and in one more recent trial, all conducted in participants under 18 years of age: clinical failure (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.57; 3 trials, 196 participants; low-certainty evidence); microbiological failure (RR 1.95, 95% CI 0.36 to 10.64, 3 trials, 196 participants; very low-certainty evidence). It is unclear whether ceftriaxone increases or decreases relapse compared to azithromycin (RR 10.05, 95% CI 1.93 to 52.38; 3 trials, 185 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Time to defervescence in participants treated with ceftriaxone may be shorter compared to participants treated with azithromycin (mean difference of -0.52 days, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.12; 3 trials, 196 participants; low-certainty evidence). Cephalosporin (ceftriaxone) versus fluoroquinolones It is unclear whether ceftriaxone has an effect on clinical failure, microbiological failure, relapse, and time to defervescence compared to fluoroquinolones in three trials published over 28 years ago and two more recent trials: clinical failure (RR 3.77, 95% CI 0.72 to 19.81; 4 trials, 359 participants; very low-certainty evidence); microbiological failure (RR 1.65, 95% CI 0.40 to 6.83; 3 trials, 316 participants; very low-certainty evidence); relapse (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.92; 3 trials, 297 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and time to defervescence (MD 2.73 days, 95% CI -0.37 to 5.84; 3 trials, 285 participants; very low-certainty evidence). It is unclear whether ceftriaxone decreases convalescent faecal carriage compared to the fluoroquinolone gatifloxacin (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.72; 1 trial, 73 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and length of hospital stay may be longer in participants treated with ceftriaxone compared to participants treated with the fluoroquinolone ofloxacin (mean of 12 days (range 7 to 23 days) in the ceftriaxone group compared to a mean of 9 days (range 6 to 13 days) in the ofloxacin group; 1 trial, 47 participants; low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on very low- to low-certainty evidence, ceftriaxone is an effective treatment for adults and children with enteric fever, with few adverse effects. Trials suggest that there may be no difference in the performance of ceftriaxone compared with azithromycin, fluoroquinolones, or chloramphenicol. Cefixime can also be used for treatment of enteric fever but may not perform as well as fluoroquinolones.  We are unable to draw firm general conclusions on comparative contemporary effectiveness given that most trials were small and conducted over 20 years previously. Clinicians need to take into account current, local resistance patterns in addition to route of administration when choosing an antimicrobial.

The combination of daptomycin with ß-lactam antibiotics is more effective than daptomycin alone for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infection.

BACKGROUND: The treatment options for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) are limited. A combination of daptomycin (DAP) and ß-lactam (BL) has been suggested; however clinical studies supporting this are lacking. METHODS: Patients with VR E. faecium bacteremia who received ≥ 8 mg/kg daptomycin for ≥ 72 h and initiated ≤ 5 days of culture collection between 2010 and 2021 were included. DAP+BL was defined as receiving BL for ≥ 24 h and within 24 h of DAP initiation. The primary endpoint was a composite clinical success (neither 14-day mortality, microbiological failure, nor change in the anti-VRE regimen). Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression and augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW). RESULTS: A total of 430 patients were enrolled (DAP, n = 45; DAP+BL, n = 385). Clinical success was achieved in 19 (42.2%) patients in the DAP group and 244 (63.4%) in the DAP+BL group [adjusted odds ratio, 3.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.61-6.33; P = 0.001]. Marginal analysis showed that the efficacy of DAP+BL was particularly significant with DAP dose ≥ 9 mg/kg and DAP minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥ 2 mg/L. With the balance of AIPW, standardized mean clinical success rates for DAP and DAP+BL 37.3% and 63.5%, respectively. The difference between DAP+BL and DAP was of 26.2% in favor of DAP+BL (95% CI, 10.0-42.3%; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DAP+BL was associated with a significantly higher rate of compositive clinical success than DAP for treatment of VR E. faecium bacteremia. The study suggested BL in combination with high-dose DAP for VR E. faecium bacteremia treatment, especially when VRE showed a high DAP MIC.

Pharmacokinetics of Oral Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide in Subjects with Various Degrees of Renal Impairment.

Tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) is an oral carbapenem prodrug antimicrobial agent with broad-spectrum activity that includes multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of TBP-PI-HBr in healthy subjects with normal renal function (cohort 1) and subjects with various degrees of renal impairment (RI [cohorts 2 to 4]) or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving hemodialysis (HD) (cohort 5). Subjects in cohorts 1 to 4 received a single oral dose of TBP-PI-HBr (600 mg). Subjects in cohort 5 received single-dose administration (600 mg) in 2 separate periods: pre-HD (period 2) and post-HD (period 1). Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for TBP, the active moiety, were determined using noncompartmental analysis. Compared with cohort 1, the TBP plasma area under the curve (AUC) increased 1.4- to 4.5-fold among cohorts 2 to 4, the maximum concentration of drug in plasma (Cmax) increased up to 1.3-fold and renal clearance (CLR) decreased from 13.4 L/h to 2.4 L/h as the severity of RI increased. Plasma TBP concentrations decreased over 8 to 12 h in cohorts 1 to 4, and apparent total body clearance (CL/F) correlated (R2 = 0.585) with creatinine clearance (CLCR). TBP urinary excretion ranged from 38% to 64% of the administered dose for cohorts 1 to 4. Subjects in cohort 5 had an approximately 7-fold increase in TBP AUC and elimination half-life (t1/2) versus cohort 1. After 4 h of HD, mean TBP plasma exposure decreased by approximately 40%. Overall, TBP plasma exposure increased with increasing RI, highlighting the renal route importance in TBP elimination. A dose reduction of TBP-PI-HBr may be needed in patients with RI (CLCR of ≤50 mL/min) and those with ESRD on HD. TBP-PI-HBr was well tolerated across all cohorts. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT04178577.).